🔗 Share this article

Internationally, governments are channeling massive amounts into what is known as “sovereign AI” – developing domestic artificial intelligence technologies. Starting with Singapore to the nation of Malaysia and Switzerland, countries are racing to create AI that grasps regional dialects and cultural nuances.

The Worldwide AI Arms Race

This trend is part of a larger global race dominated by tech giants from the United States and the People's Republic of China. Whereas firms like OpenAI and a social media giant pour substantial capital, developing countries are also making their own bets in the artificial intelligence domain.

But with such vast investments at stake, is it possible for developing nations secure significant gains? According to an expert from an influential policy organization, If not you’re a affluent government or a major firm, it’s quite a challenge to develop an LLM from nothing.”

Defence Considerations

Many states are reluctant to depend on overseas AI technologies. Across India, as an example, Western-developed AI systems have sometimes fallen short. An illustrative example involved an AI tool employed to teach students in a remote village – it spoke in the English language with a strong American accent that was difficult to follow for local students.

Then there’s the national security dimension. For the Indian security agencies, relying on particular foreign systems is viewed inadmissible. As one entrepreneur noted, There might be some arbitrary training dataset that could claim that, such as, a certain region is separate from India … Using that specific system in a defence setup is a big no-no.”

He added, “I have spoken to experts who are in defence. They want to use AI, but, forget about specific systems, they are reluctant to rely on American systems because information may be transferred overseas, and that is totally inappropriate with them.”

National Projects

As a result, some countries are backing local ventures. One such initiative is underway in the Indian market, wherein a firm is striving to develop a sovereign LLM with state funding. This effort has committed roughly $1.25bn to AI development.

The developer foresees a AI that is more compact than leading tools from Western and Eastern firms. He states that the country will have to make up for the financial disparity with talent. Located in India, we do not possess the luxury of allocating billions of dollars into it,” he says. “How do we compete with for example the hundreds of billions that the United States is devoting? I think that is where the core expertise and the strategic thinking comes in.”

Regional Focus

Throughout the city-state, a state-backed program is supporting language models educated in the region's local dialects. Such languages – such as the Malay language, the Thai language, Lao, Bahasa Indonesia, the Khmer language and additional ones – are frequently inadequately covered in American and Asian LLMs.

I wish the people who are creating these independent AI tools were informed of just how far and how quickly the cutting edge is moving.

A senior director engaged in the project explains that these systems are created to complement more extensive AI, instead of displacing them. Tools such as a popular AI tool and Gemini, he states, frequently find it challenging to handle regional languages and local customs – interacting in unnatural the Khmer language, as an example, or suggesting pork-based meals to Malaysian users.

Building native-tongue LLMs allows national authorities to incorporate cultural nuance – and at least be “informed users” of a sophisticated system created elsewhere.

He adds, “I’m very careful with the concept national. I think what we’re aiming to convey is we aim to be more accurately reflected and we wish to comprehend the capabilities” of AI systems.

Cross-Border Collaboration

For states attempting to find their place in an intensifying global market, there’s an alternative: collaborate. Experts associated with a prominent institution put forward a public AI company allocated across a alliance of emerging countries.

They refer to the proposal “an AI equivalent of Airbus”, drawing inspiration from the European successful strategy to build a competitor to Boeing in the 1960s. This idea would entail the establishment of a state-backed AI entity that would pool the resources of several nations’ AI initiatives – including the United Kingdom, the Kingdom of Spain, Canada, Germany, Japan, the Republic of Singapore, South Korea, France, Switzerland and Sweden – to create a competitive rival to the US and Chinese major players.

The main proponent of a report setting out the proposal notes that the concept has drawn the interest of AI ministers of at least a few nations so far, as well as a number of sovereign AI companies. Although it is now focused on “developing countries”, developing countries – Mongolia and the Republic of Rwanda among them – have additionally shown curiosity.

He elaborates, Currently, I think it’s an accepted truth there’s less trust in the assurances of this current US administration. Individuals are wondering such as, should we trust such systems? In case they choose to